D2 Men's Soccer Ratings

Updated Oct 2, 6:34 a.m. ET · 2026 season · 915 games between D2 teams so far

Rankings · Peach Belt Conference · Super Region 2

Clayton State University

Ranked 32nd of 202 D2 teams (likely between 15th and 86th) and 3rd of 7 in the Peach Belt. 32% chance of making the NCAA tournament, mostly by winning the Peach Belt tournament.

Record 5-2-3 (W-L-T) · 5-2-3 against D2 teams

NCAA tournament chance

32%

Most of its chance comes from winning the Peach Belt tournament (the auto bid).

Top-four seed in Super Region 2 (first chance to host games): 5%

Rank

32 of 202

Likely between 15th and 86th

3rd of 7 in the Peach Belt (likely 1st to 4th)

Rating

+0.65

Would beat an average D2 team by about 0.6 goals a game, on a neutral field.

Likely range +0.20 to +1.09

Attack and defense

Attack +0.51: scores 0.51 more goals a game than an average D2 team.

Defense +0.13: concedes 0.13 fewer goals a game than an average D2 team.

Attack + defense = rating.

What it takes to make the NCAA tournament

There are two ways in. How qualifying works.

How many more wins it needs

Its last 6 games against D2 teams: how many it might win, and its NCAA chance in each case. A tie counts as half a win.

WinsHow likelyNCAA chance then
0 under 1% –
1 4% about 10%
2 17% about 15%
3 27% about 15%
4 30% about 35%
5 19% about 60%
6 (all) 4% over 99%

– means too few simulated seasons to say. Which games are won matters as well as how many: wins over strong teams and away wins count for more.

If Clayton St. wins all 6: it makes the NCAA tournament as an at-large team, even without the conference title.

Rating over the season

Line: rating after each daily update. Shaded: likely range. Above 0 is better than an average D2 team.

0+0.5+1.0+1.5Oct

How sure is the rank?

Taller bars are more likely. Clayton St. likely (8 in 10) ranks between 15th and 86th.

427507396119better rank →

Still to play

win tie loss chances for each game. A tie can be the likeliest single score even when a win is more likely overall.

Oct 3 v Flagler W 43% · T 22% · L 35% likeliest 1–1
Oct 10 v Lander W 51% · T 22% · L 27% likeliest 1–1
Oct 14 at North Georgia W 32% · T 21% · L 47% likeliest 1–1
Oct 17 at USC Aiken W 70% · T 16% · L 14% likeliest 2–0
Oct 21 v Ga. Southwestern W 69% · T 17% · L 14% likeliest 2–0
Oct 24 v Middle Georgia W 87% · T 8% · L 5% likeliest 3–0

Results

How much each result changed the rating. A win can lower it if the model expected a bigger win; a narrow loss to a strong team can raise it.

Sep 30 at Ga. Southwestern W 3–1 Rating +0.06
Sep 26 v Young Harris T 2–2 Rating −0.00
Sep 23 v USC Aiken W 4–0 Rating +0.08
Sep 16 v North Georgia T 2–2 Rating −0.01
Sep 12 at Flagler L 1–3 Rating −0.07
Sep 9 at Middle Georgia W 4–2 Rating −0.01
Sep 5 at Florida Tech L 1–2 Rating −0.03
Sep 3 at Tampa T 1–1 Rating +0.01
Aug 29 v Barry W 3–1 Rating +0.06
Aug 27 v Christian Brothers W 3–0 Rating +0.12