D2 Men's Soccer Ratings

Updated Oct 2, 6:34 a.m. ET · 2026 season · 915 games between D2 teams so far

Rankings · Peach Belt Conference · Super Region 2

University of South Carolina Aiken

Ranked 174th of 202 D2 teams (likely between 144th and 187th) and 6th of 7 in the Peach Belt. 0% chance of making the NCAA tournament, mostly by winning the Peach Belt tournament.

Record 3-5-0 (W-L-T) · 3-5-0 against D2 teams

Compare with another team

NCAA tournament chance

0%

Most of its chance comes from winning the Peach Belt tournament (the auto bid).

Rank

174 of 202

Likely between 144th and 187th

6th of 7 in the Peach Belt (likely 5th to 7th)

Rating

−0.87

Would lose to an average D2 team by about 0.9 goals a game, on a neutral field.

Likely range −1.41 to −0.42

Attack and defense

Attack −0.35: scores 0.35 fewer goals a game than an average D2 team.

Defense −0.53: concedes 0.53 more goals a game than an average D2 team.

Attack + defense = rating.

What it takes to make the NCAA tournament

There are two ways in. How qualifying works.

How many more wins it needs

Its last 6 games against D2 teams: how many it might win, and its NCAA chance in each case. A tie counts as half a win.

WinsHow likelyNCAA chance then
0 21% under 5%
1 42% under 5%
2 25% under 5%
3 10% under 5%
4 2% –
5 under 1% –
6 (all) under 1% under 5%

– means too few simulated seasons to say. Which games are won matters as well as how many: wins over strong teams and away wins count for more.

If USC Aiken wins all 6: its NPI clears the cut line in 1% of simulated seasons, without needing the conference title.

Rating over the season

Line: rating after each daily update. Shaded: likely range. Above 0 is better than an average D2 team.

−3.0−2.0−1.00Oct

How sure is the rank?

Taller bars are more likely. USC Aiken likely (8 in 10) ranks between 144th and 187th.

106122138154170186better rank →

Still to play

win tie loss chances for each game. A tie can be the likeliest single score even when a win is more likely overall.

Oct 3 v North Georgia W 12% · T 15% · L 73% likeliest 0–2 · compare
Oct 7 v Middle Georgia W 51% · T 20% · L 28% likeliest 2–1 · compare
Oct 14 at Flagler W 8% · T 13% · L 78% likeliest 0–2 · compare
Oct 17 v Clayton St. W 14% · T 16% · L 70% likeliest 0–2 · compare
Oct 21 v Lander W 19% · T 21% · L 61% likeliest 0–1 · compare
Oct 24 at Ga. Southwestern W 25% · T 23% · L 52% likeliest 1–1 · compare

Results

How much each result changed the rating. A win can lower it if the model expected a bigger win; a narrow loss to a strong team can raise it.

Sep 30 at Lander W 2–1 Rating +0.12
Sep 26 v Ga. Southwestern W 1–0 Rating +0.12
Sep 23 at Clayton St. L 0–4 Rating −0.07
Sep 19 at Middle Georgia L 1–3 Rating −0.09
Sep 16 v Flagler L 1–2 Rating +0.04
Sep 12 at North Georgia L 0–2 Rating +0.06
Sep 1 v Erskine W 4–2 Rating −0.00
Aug 27 at Southern Wesleyan L 0–4 Rating −0.15