D2 Men's Soccer Ratings

Updated Oct 2, 6:34 a.m. ET · 2026 season · 915 games between D2 teams so far

Rankings · Conference Carolinas · Super Region 2

Southern Wesleyan University

Ranked 138th of 202 D2 teams (likely between 95th and 163rd) and 9th of 15 in the Carolinas. 4% chance of making the NCAA tournament, mostly by winning the Carolinas tournament.

Record 7-3-1 (W-L-T) · 6-2-1 against D2 teams

NCAA tournament chance

4%

Most of its chance comes from winning the Carolinas tournament (the auto bid).

Rank

138 of 202

Likely between 95th and 163rd

9th of 15 in the Carolinas (likely 6th to 11th)

Rating

−0.29

Would lose to an average D2 team by about 0.3 goals a game, on a neutral field.

Likely range −0.75 to +0.11

Attack and defense

Attack −0.19: scores 0.19 fewer goals a game than an average D2 team.

Defense −0.11: concedes 0.11 more goals a game than an average D2 team.

Attack + defense = rating.

What it takes to make the NCAA tournament

There are two ways in. How qualifying works.

How many more wins it needs

Its last 7 games against D2 teams: how many it might win, and its NCAA chance in each case. A tie counts as half a win.

WinsHow likelyNCAA chance then
0 0% –
1 7% under 5%
2 21% under 5%
3 30% under 5%
4 25% under 5%
5 12% about 10%
6 3% about 10%
7 (all) under 1% about 75%

– means too few simulated seasons to say. Which games are won matters as well as how many: wins over strong teams and away wins count for more.

If Southern Wesleyan wins all 7: its NPI clears the cut line in 74% of simulated seasons, without needing the conference title.

Rating over the season

Line: rating after each daily update. Shaded: likely range. Above 0 is better than an average D2 team.

−1.0−0.50+0.5Oct

How sure is the rank?

Taller bars are more likely. Southern Wesleyan likely (8 in 10) ranks between 95th and 163rd.

456891114137160better rank →

Still to play

win tie loss chances for each game. A tie can be the likeliest single score even when a win is more likely overall.

Oct 3 at Belmont Abbey W 32% · T 25% · L 43% likeliest 1–1
Oct 6 v Young Harris W 20% · T 20% · L 60% likeliest 1–2
Oct 10 v King (TN) W 51% · T 25% · L 23% likeliest 1–0
Oct 14 v Erskine W 72% · T 16% · L 12% likeliest 2–0
Oct 17 v North Greenville W 40% · T 26% · L 34% likeliest 1–1
Oct 21 at Emmanuel (GA) W 32% · T 24% · L 44% likeliest 1–1
Oct 24 at Shorter W 75% · T 14% · L 11% likeliest 2–0

Results

How much each result changed the rating. A win can lower it if the model expected a bigger win; a narrow loss to a strong team can raise it.

Sep 30 v Emmanuel (GA) W 5–3 Rating −0.02
Sep 26 v Pensacola Christian · not a D2 team, not rated W 1–0
Sep 22 v Shorter W 1–0 Rating +0.00
Sep 19 at Ferrum W 1–0 Rating +0.08
Sep 16 at Erskine W 2–0 Rating +0.05
Sep 12 v Barton T 2–2 Rating −0.05
Sep 9 at Tusculum L 0–2 Rating −0.08
Sep 5 at Young Harris L 2–3 Rating −0.02
Sep 2 at Newberry W 3–1 Rating +0.05
Aug 29 v CarolinaU · not a D2 team, not rated L 2–3
Aug 27 v USC Aiken W 4–0 Rating +0.12