D2 Men's Soccer Ratings

Updated Oct 2, 6:34 a.m. ET · 2026 season · 915 games between D2 teams so far

Rankings · Great Midwest Athletic Conference · Super Region 3

Kentucky Wesleyan College

Ranked 103rd of 202 D2 teams (likely between 57th and 139th) and 6th of 11 in the G-MAC. 8% chance of making the NCAA tournament, mostly by winning the G-MAC tournament.

Record 4-3-1 (W-L-T) · 4-3-1 against D2 teams

Compare with another team

NCAA tournament chance

8%

Most of its chance comes from winning the G-MAC tournament (the auto bid).

Top-four seed in Super Region 3 (first chance to host games): 0%

Rank

103 of 202

Likely between 57th and 139th

6th of 11 in the G-MAC (likely 3rd to 7th)

Rating

+0.08

Would beat an average D2 team by about 0.1 goals a game, on a neutral field.

Likely range −0.35 to +0.48

Attack and defense

Attack −0.04: scores 0.04 fewer goals a game than an average D2 team.

Defense +0.12: concedes 0.12 fewer goals a game than an average D2 team.

Attack + defense = rating.

What it takes to make the NCAA tournament

There are two ways in. How qualifying works.

How many more wins it needs

Its last 8 games against D2 teams: how many it might win, and its NCAA chance in each case. A tie counts as half a win.

WinsHow likelyNCAA chance then
0 2% –
1 8% under 5%
2 20% under 5%
3 28% under 5%
4 24% about 5%
5 13% about 15%
6 5% about 30%
7 1% –
8 (all) under 1% over 99%

– means too few simulated seasons to say. Which games are won matters as well as how many: wins over strong teams and away wins count for more.

If Ky. Wesleyan wins all 8: it makes the NCAA tournament as an at-large team, even without the conference title.

Rating over the season

Line: rating after each daily update. Shaded: likely range. Above 0 is better than an average D2 team.

−1.0−0.50+0.5+1.0Oct

How sure is the rank?

Taller bars are more likely. Ky. Wesleyan likely (8 in 10) ranks between 57th and 139th.

16406488112136160better rank →

Still to play

win tie loss chances for each game. A tie can be the likeliest single score even when a win is more likely overall.

Oct 3 at Cedarville W 29% · T 28% · L 42% likeliest 0–1 · compare
Oct 8 v Tiffin W 19% · T 26% · L 54% likeliest 0–1 · compare
Oct 10 v Walsh W 74% · T 15% · L 11% likeliest 2–0 · compare
Oct 15 at Northwood W 53% · T 23% · L 24% likeliest 1–1 · compare
Oct 17 at Findlay W 24% · T 24% · L 51% likeliest 0–1 · compare
Oct 22 at Ashland W 39% · T 24% · L 37% likeliest 1–1 · compare
Oct 24 at Ohio Dominican W 61% · T 21% · L 18% likeliest 1–0 · compare
Oct 27 v Thomas More W 33% · T 27% · L 40% likeliest 1–1 · compare

Results

How much each result changed the rating. A win can lower it if the model expected a bigger win; a narrow loss to a strong team can raise it.

Oct 1 at Malone T 0–0 Rating −0.01
Sep 26 v Ohio Dominican W 1–0 Rating −0.01
Sep 24 v Malone W 6–0 Rating +0.17
Sep 17 at Thomas More L 0–2 Rating −0.06
Sep 12 v Findlay W 2–1 Rating +0.04
Sep 10 v Lake Erie L 1–4 Rating −0.16
Sep 4 at Union (TN) W 2–1 Rating +0.02
Aug 27 at Mo.-St. Louis L 0–1 Rating −0.03