D2 Men's Soccer Ratings

Updated Oct 2, 6:34 a.m. ET · 2026 season · 915 games between D2 teams so far

Rankings · Great Midwest Athletic Conference · Super Region 3

Northwood University

Ranked 170th of 202 D2 teams (likely between 139th and 184th) and 8th of 11 in the G-MAC. 1% chance of making the NCAA tournament, mostly by winning the G-MAC tournament.

Record 2-6-1 (W-L-T) · 2-6-1 against D2 teams

NCAA tournament chance

1%

Most of its chance comes from winning the G-MAC tournament (the auto bid).

Rank

170 of 202

Likely between 139th and 184th

8th of 11 in the G-MAC (likely 7th to 10th)

Rating

−0.77

Would lose to an average D2 team by about 0.8 goals a game, on a neutral field.

Likely range −1.25 to −0.36

Attack and defense

Attack −0.29: scores 0.29 fewer goals a game than an average D2 team.

Defense −0.50: concedes 0.50 more goals a game than an average D2 team.

Attack + defense = rating.

What it takes to make the NCAA tournament

There are two ways in. How qualifying works.

How many more wins it needs

Its last 8 games against D2 teams: how many it might win, and its NCAA chance in each case. A tie counts as half a win.

WinsHow likelyNCAA chance then
0 11% under 5%
1 27% under 5%
2 28% under 5%
3 20% under 5%
4 10% under 5%
5 2% under 5%
6 under 1% –
7 under 1% –
8 (all) under 1% about 15%

– means too few simulated seasons to say. Which games are won matters as well as how many: wins over strong teams and away wins count for more.

If Northwood wins all 8: its NPI clears the cut line in 15% of simulated seasons, without needing the conference title.

Rating over the season

Line: rating after each daily update. Shaded: likely range. Above 0 is better than an average D2 team.

−2.0−1.5−1.0−0.50Oct

How sure is the rank?

Taller bars are more likely. Northwood likely (8 in 10) ranks between 139th and 184th.

103119135151167183199better rank →

Still to play

win tie loss chances for each game. A tie can be the likeliest single score even when a win is more likely overall.

Oct 3 v Thomas More W 17% · T 21% · L 61% likeliest 0–1
Oct 8 at Ashland W 21% · T 20% · L 59% likeliest 1–2
Oct 10 at Ohio Dominican W 42% · T 23% · L 35% likeliest 1–1
Oct 15 v Ky. Wesleyan W 24% · T 23% · L 53% likeliest 1–1
Oct 17 v Cedarville W 21% · T 25% · L 54% likeliest 0–1
Oct 22 at Lake Erie W 14% · T 18% · L 68% likeliest 0–2
Oct 24 at Malone W 39% · T 24% · L 37% likeliest 1–1
Oct 27 v Findlay W 17% · T 20% · L 64% likeliest 0–2

Results

How much each result changed the rating. A win can lower it if the model expected a bigger win; a narrow loss to a strong team can raise it.

Oct 1 v Tiffin L 0–1 Rating +0.06
Sep 26 at Tiffin L 1–2 Rating +0.04
Sep 24 at Cedarville L 0–3 Rating −0.08
Sep 19 v Ashland W 2–0 Rating +0.12
Sep 12 v Walsh W 3–2 Rating −0.02
Sep 8 at Findlay L 0–1 Rating +0.08
Sep 3 v Davenport T 2–2 Rating −0.01
Aug 30 at Purdue Northwest L 0–1 Rating +0.04
Aug 27 v Northern Mich. L 1–4 Rating −0.12