D2 Men's Soccer Ratings

Updated Oct 2, 6:34 a.m. ET · 2026 season · 915 games between D2 teams so far

Rankings · Great Midwest Athletic Conference · Super Region 3

Cedarville University

Ranked 87th of 202 D2 teams (likely between 54th and 123rd) and 5th of 11 in the G-MAC. 9% chance of making the NCAA tournament, mostly by winning the G-MAC tournament.

Record 5-5-1 (W-L-T) · 5-5-1 against D2 teams

NCAA tournament chance

9%

Most of its chance comes from winning the G-MAC tournament (the auto bid).

Top-four seed in Super Region 3 (first chance to host games): <1%

Rank

87 of 202

Likely between 54th and 123rd

5th of 11 in the G-MAC (likely 3rd to 7th)

Rating

+0.18

Would beat an average D2 team by about 0.2 goals a game, on a neutral field.

Likely range −0.15 to +0.50

Attack and defense

Attack −0.16: scores 0.16 fewer goals a game than an average D2 team.

Defense +0.33: concedes 0.33 fewer goals a game than an average D2 team.

Attack + defense = rating.

What it takes to make the NCAA tournament

There are two ways in. How qualifying works.

How many more wins it needs

Its last 7 games against D2 teams: how many it might win, and its NCAA chance in each case. A tie counts as half a win.

WinsHow likelyNCAA chance then
0 4% under 5%
1 16% under 5%
2 33% about 10%
3 25% about 10%
4 15% about 15%
5 6% about 15%
6 1% –
7 (all) under 1% about 95%

– means too few simulated seasons to say. Which games are won matters as well as how many: wins over strong teams and away wins count for more.

If Cedarville wins all 7: its NPI clears the cut line in 97% of simulated seasons, without needing the conference title.

Rating over the season

Line: rating after each daily update. Shaded: likely range. Above 0 is better than an average D2 team.

−0.5−0.20+0.2+0.5+0.8Oct

How sure is the rank?

Taller bars are more likely. Cedarville likely (8 in 10) ranks between 54th and 123rd.

26507498122146170better rank →

Still to play

win tie loss chances for each game. A tie can be the likeliest single score even when a win is more likely overall.

Oct 3 v Ky. Wesleyan W 42% · T 28% · L 29% likeliest 1–0
Oct 8 at Findlay W 26% · T 27% · L 46% likeliest 0–1
Oct 10 v Tiffin W 21% · T 30% · L 49% likeliest 0–1
Oct 15 v Thomas More W 34% · T 30% · L 36% likeliest 0–1
Oct 17 at Northwood W 54% · T 25% · L 21% likeliest 1–0
Oct 22 at Tiffin W 16% · T 28% · L 56% likeliest 0–1
Oct 24 at Walsh W 66% · T 20% · L 14% likeliest 1–0

Results

How much each result changed the rating. A win can lower it if the model expected a bigger win; a narrow loss to a strong team can raise it.

Oct 1 at Lake Erie W 2–1 Rating +0.05
Sep 26 at Ashland W 2–1 Rating +0.03
Sep 24 v Northwood W 3–0 Rating +0.07
Sep 19 at Thomas More L 0–1 Rating −0.01
Sep 17 v Malone L 1–4 Rating −0.13
Sep 12 v Ashland W 4–1 Rating +0.07
Sep 10 v Ohio Dominican W 2–0 Rating +0.02
Sep 5 at Maryville (MO) L 0–2 Rating −0.03
Sep 3 v McKendree L 0–2 Rating −0.05
Aug 29 at Roosevelt L 0–2 Rating −0.04
Aug 27 v UIndy T 0–0 Rating +0.02