D2 Men's Soccer Ratings

Updated Oct 2, 6:34 a.m. ET · 2026 season · 915 games between D2 teams so far

Rankings · Great Lakes Valley Conference · Super Region 3

Maryville University of Saint Louis

Ranked 14th of 202 D2 teams (likely between 6th and 50th) and 1st of 15 in the GLVC. 86% chance of making the NCAA tournament, mostly through an at-large place.

Record 8-2-1 (W-L-T) · 8-2-1 against D2 teams

NCAA tournament chance

86%

With 4 or more wins from its last 7 games against D2 teams, its NCAA chance is about 98%; with fewer, about 65%.

Top-four seed in Super Region 3 (first chance to host games): 43%

Rank

14 of 202

Likely between 6th and 50th

1st of 15 in the GLVC (likely 1st to 4th)

Rating

+0.97

Would beat an average D2 team by about 1.0 goals a game, on a neutral field.

Likely range +0.55 to +1.49

Attack and defense

Attack +0.61: scores 0.61 more goals a game than an average D2 team.

Defense +0.36: concedes 0.36 fewer goals a game than an average D2 team.

Attack + defense = rating.

What it takes to make the NCAA tournament

There are two ways in. How qualifying works.

How many more wins it needs

Its last 7 games against D2 teams: how many it might win, and its NCAA chance in each case. A tie counts as half a win.

WinsHow likelyNCAA chance then
0 under 1% –
1 3% about 25%
2 10% about 50%
3 24% about 75%
4 27% about 95%
5 24% over 99%
6 11% over 99%
7 (all) 2% over 99%

– means too few simulated seasons to say. Which games are won matters as well as how many: wins over strong teams and away wins count for more.

If Maryville (MO) wins all 7: it makes the NCAA tournament as an at-large team, even without the conference title.

Rating over the season

Line: rating after each daily update. Shaded: likely range. Above 0 is better than an average D2 team.

0+0.5+1.0+1.5+2.0Oct

How sure is the rank?

Taller bars are more likely. Maryville (MO) likely (8 in 10) ranks between 6th and 50th.

11631466176better rank →

Still to play

win tie loss chances for each game. A tie can be the likeliest single score even when a win is more likely overall.

Oct 3 at Rockhurst W 53% · T 21% · L 26% likeliest 1–1
Oct 7 at Quincy W 40% · T 27% · L 33% likeliest 1–1
Oct 10 v Ill. Springfield W 80% · T 12% · L 8% likeliest 3–0
Oct 14 v Lincoln (MO) W 46% · T 24% · L 30% likeliest 1–1
Oct 17 at Drury W 44% · T 23% · L 33% likeliest 1–1
Oct 21 at Mo.-St. Louis W 57% · T 22% · L 21% likeliest 1–0
Oct 24 v William Jewell W 77% · T 14% · L 9% likeliest 2–0

Results

How much each result changed the rating. A win can lower it if the model expected a bigger win; a narrow loss to a strong team can raise it.

Sep 30 at UIndy W 2–0 Rating +0.07
Sep 26 v Missouri S&T W 2–1 Rating +0.01
Sep 23 at Upper Iowa W 3–1 Rating +0.00
Sep 19 v McKendree W 2–1 Rating +0.01
Sep 16 v Southwest Baptist W 10–2 Rating +0.22 ≈
Sep 13 at Truman St. T 2–2 Rating −0.06
Sep 9 v Lewis W 4–1 Rating +0.08
Sep 5 v Cedarville W 2–0 Rating +0.04
Sep 3 at Wis.-Parkside L 0–1 Rating −0.08
Aug 29 at Rogers St. L 1–3 Rating −0.05
Aug 27 at Southern Nazarene W 2–0 Rating +0.07

≈ rough estimate.