D2 Men's Soccer Ratings

Updated Oct 2, 6:34 a.m. ET · 2026 season · 915 games between D2 teams so far

Rankings · Great Lakes Intercollegiate Athletic Conference · Super Region 3

Saginaw Valley State University

Ranked 10th of 202 D2 teams (likely between 5th and 39th) and 1st of 7 in the GLIAC. 95% chance of making the NCAA tournament.

Record 3-1-4 (W-L-T) · 3-1-4 against D2 teams

NCAA tournament chance

95%

With 5 or more wins from its last 8 games against D2 teams, its NCAA chance is about over 99%; with fewer, about 86%.

Top-four seed in Super Region 3 (first chance to host games): 75%

Rank

10 of 202

Likely between 5th and 39th

1st of 7 in the GLIAC (likely 1st to 2nd)

Rating

+1.07

Would beat an average D2 team by about 1.1 goals a game, on a neutral field.

Likely range +0.66 to +1.56

Attack and defense

Attack +0.53: scores 0.53 more goals a game than an average D2 team.

Defense +0.55: concedes 0.55 fewer goals a game than an average D2 team.

Attack + defense = rating.

What it takes to make the NCAA tournament

There are two ways in. How qualifying works.

How many more wins it needs

Its last 8 games against D2 teams: how many it might win, and its NCAA chance in each case. A tie counts as half a win.

WinsHow likelyNCAA chance then
0 under 1% –
1 1% –
2 4% about 65%
3 10% about 80%
4 21% about 95%
5 26% over 99%
6 25% over 99%
7 11% over 99%
8 (all) 3% over 99%

– means too few simulated seasons to say. Which games are won matters as well as how many: wins over strong teams and away wins count for more.

If Saginaw Valley wins all 8: it makes the NCAA tournament as an at-large team, even without the conference title.

Rating over the season

Line: rating after each daily update. Shaded: likely range. Above 0 is better than an average D2 team.

0+1.0+2.0+3.0Oct

How sure is the rank?

Taller bars are more likely. Saginaw Valley likely (8 in 10) ranks between 5th and 39th.

11529435771better rank →

Still to play

win tie loss chances for each game. A tie can be the likeliest single score even when a win is more likely overall.

Oct 2 v Roosevelt W 50% · T 27% · L 22% likeliest 1–0
Oct 4 v St. Cloud St. W 82% · T 12% · L 6% likeliest 2–0
Oct 9 at St. Cloud St. W 75% · T 16% · L 10% likeliest 2–0
Oct 11 at Roosevelt W 42% · T 29% · L 29% likeliest 1–0
Oct 16 v Wis.-Parkside W 67% · T 19% · L 14% likeliest 2–0
Oct 18 v Purdue Northwest W 67% · T 20% · L 13% likeliest 1–0
Oct 21 at Davenport W 69% · T 18% · L 12% likeliest 2–0
Oct 25 at Northern Mich. W 48% · T 25% · L 27% likeliest 1–0

Results

How much each result changed the rating. A win can lower it if the model expected a bigger win; a narrow loss to a strong team can raise it.

Sep 27 at Wis.-Parkside T 0–0 Rating −0.03
Sep 25 at Purdue Northwest T 0–0 Rating −0.07
Sep 18 v Northern Mich. L 1–2 Rating −0.07
Sep 16 v Davenport W 6–0 Rating +0.17
Sep 6 v Northern Mich. W 4–1 Rating +0.09
Sep 3 at Tiffin T 1–1 Rating +0.01
Aug 30 at Charleston (WV) W 3–1 Rating +0.12
Aug 27 v Lincoln (MO) T 2–2 Rating −0.01