D2 Men's Soccer Ratings

Updated Oct 2, 6:34 a.m. ET · 2026 season · 915 games between D2 teams so far

Rankings · Great American Conference · Super Region 3

Southern Nazarene University

Ranked 73rd of 202 D2 teams (likely between 35th and 120th) and 3rd of 7 in the GAC. 10% chance of making the NCAA tournament, mostly by winning the GAC tournament.

Record 5-3-1 (W-L-T) · 5-3-1 against D2 teams

NCAA tournament chance

10%

Most of its chance comes from winning the GAC tournament (the auto bid).

Top-four seed in Super Region 3 (first chance to host games): <1%

Rank

73 of 202

Likely between 35th and 120th

3rd of 7 in the GAC (likely 3rd to 4th)

Rating

+0.31

Would beat an average D2 team by about 0.3 goals a game, on a neutral field.

Likely range −0.13 to +0.74

Attack and defense

Attack +0.21: scores 0.21 more goals a game than an average D2 team.

Defense +0.10: concedes 0.10 fewer goals a game than an average D2 team.

Attack + defense = rating.

What it takes to make the NCAA tournament

There are two ways in. How qualifying works.

How many more wins it needs

Its last 8 games against D2 teams: how many it might win, and its NCAA chance in each case. A tie counts as half a win.

WinsHow likelyNCAA chance then
0 1% –
1 6% under 5%
2 19% about 5%
3 27% about 5%
4 25% about 5%
5 15% about 15%
6 5% about 40%
7 1% –
8 (all) under 1% over 99%

– means too few simulated seasons to say. Which games are won matters as well as how many: wins over strong teams and away wins count for more.

If Southern Nazarene wins all 8: it makes the NCAA tournament as an at-large team, even without the conference title.

Rating over the season

Line: rating after each daily update. Shaded: likely range. Above 0 is better than an average D2 team.

−0.50+0.5+1.0Oct

How sure is the rank?

Taller bars are more likely. Southern Nazarene likely (8 in 10) ranks between 35th and 120th.

7325782107132157better rank →

Still to play

win tie loss chances for each game. A tie can be the likeliest single score even when a win is more likely overall.

Oct 3 at Newman W 47% · T 23% · L 31% likeliest 1–1
Oct 8 v Rogers St. W 25% · T 23% · L 52% likeliest 1–1
Oct 10 at Harding W 74% · T 15% · L 11% likeliest 2–0
Oct 14 at Ouachita Baptist W 55% · T 26% · L 19% likeliest 1–0
Oct 17 v Northeastern St. W 52% · T 23% · L 26% likeliest 1–1
Oct 22 at Rogers St. W 18% · T 21% · L 61% likeliest 0–1
Oct 29 at Fort Hays St. W 12% · T 18% · L 70% likeliest 0–2
Oct 31 v Newman W 56% · T 21% · L 23% likeliest 1–1

Results

How much each result changed the rating. A win can lower it if the model expected a bigger win; a narrow loss to a strong team can raise it.

Oct 1 v Fort Hays St. L 0–3 Rating −0.08
Sep 23 at Northeastern St. T 3–3 Rating −0.02
Sep 19 v Ouachita Baptist W 1–0 Rating +0.00
Sep 17 v Harding W 3–1 Rating −0.02
Sep 13 at Okla. Christian W 2–1 Rating +0.05
Sep 10 at Midwestern St. L 1–3 Rating −0.01
Sep 5 v West Tex. A&M W 1–0 Rating +0.00
Aug 29 at McKendree W 2–1 Rating +0.05
Aug 27 v Maryville (MO) L 0–2 Rating −0.06