D2 Men's Soccer Ratings

Updated Oct 2, 6:34 a.m. ET · 2026 season · 915 games between D2 teams so far

Rankings · Great American Conference · Super Region 3

Fort Hays State University

Ranked 6th of 202 D2 teams (likely between 3rd and 20th) and 1st of 7 in the GAC. 95% chance of making the NCAA tournament, mostly by winning the GAC tournament.

Record 7-1-2 (W-L-T) · 7-1-2 against D2 teams

NCAA tournament chance

95%

Most of its chance comes from winning the GAC tournament (the auto bid).

Top-four seed in Super Region 3 (first chance to host games): 62%

Rank

6 of 202

Likely between 3rd and 20th

1st of 7 in the GAC (likely 1st to 2nd)

Rating

+1.38

Would beat an average D2 team by about 1.4 goals a game, on a neutral field.

Likely range +0.98 to +1.82

Attack and defense

Attack +0.69: scores 0.69 more goals a game than an average D2 team.

Defense +0.70: concedes 0.70 fewer goals a game than an average D2 team.

Attack + defense = rating.

What it takes to make the NCAA tournament

There are two ways in. How qualifying works.

How many more wins it needs

Its last 7 games against D2 teams: how many it might win, and its NCAA chance in each case. A tie counts as half a win.

WinsHow likelyNCAA chance then
0 under 1% –
1 under 1% –
2 2% –
3 7% about 75%
4 21% about 90%
5 32% about 100%
6 29% over 99%
7 (all) 9% over 99%

– means too few simulated seasons to say. Which games are won matters as well as how many: wins over strong teams and away wins count for more.

If Fort Hays St. wins all 7: it makes the NCAA tournament as an at-large team, even without the conference title.

Rating over the season

Line: rating after each daily update. Shaded: likely range. Above 0 is better than an average D2 team.

0+1.0+2.0+3.0Oct

How sure is the rank?

Taller bars are more likely. Fort Hays St. likely (8 in 10) ranks between 3rd and 20th.

191725334149better rank →

Still to play

win tie loss chances for each game. A tie can be the likeliest single score even when a win is more likely overall.

Oct 8 v Newman W 80% · T 13% · L 7% likeliest 2–0
Oct 10 at Rogers St. W 42% · T 27% · L 30% likeliest 1–0
Oct 15 at Northeastern St. W 68% · T 19% · L 12% likeliest 1–0
Oct 17 at Newman W 73% · T 17% · L 10% likeliest 2–0
Oct 22 v Ouachita Baptist W 81% · T 15% · L 4% likeliest 2–0
Oct 24 v Harding W 94% · T 4% · L 1% likeliest 4–0
Oct 29 v Southern Nazarene W 70% · T 18% · L 12% likeliest 2–0

Results

How much each result changed the rating. A win can lower it if the model expected a bigger win; a narrow loss to a strong team can raise it.

Oct 1 at Southern Nazarene W 3–0 Rating +0.08
Sep 26 at Ouachita Baptist W 1–0 Rating −0.05
Sep 24 at Harding W 2–0 Rating −0.08
Sep 19 v Northeastern St. W 2–1 Rating −0.05
Sep 17 v Rogers St. W 2–0 Rating +0.05
Sep 12 at Lubbock Christian T 1–1 Rating −0.06
Sep 6 v Fort Lewis T 1–1 Rating −0.05
Sep 2 v William Jewell W 2–0 Rating −0.04
Aug 29 v Regis (CO) L 0–1 Rating −0.09
Aug 27 v Rockhurst W 4–1 Rating +0.06