D2 Men's Soccer Ratings

Updated Oct 2, 6:34 a.m. ET · 2026 season · 915 games between D2 teams so far

Rankings · Rocky Mountain Athletic Conference · Super Region 4

Fort Lewis College

Ranked 9th of 202 D2 teams (likely between 4th and 41st) and 1st of 11 in the RMAC. 67% chance of making the NCAA tournament, mostly through an at-large place.

Record 5-2-2 (W-L-T) · 5-2-2 against D2 teams

NCAA tournament chance

67%

With 5 or more wins from its last 8 games against D2 teams, its NCAA chance is about 85%; with fewer, about 35%.

Top-four seed in Super Region 4 (first chance to host games): 28%

Rank

9 of 202

Likely between 4th and 41st

1st of 11 in the RMAC (likely 1st to 4th)

Rating

+1.14

Would beat an average D2 team by about 1.1 goals a game, on a neutral field.

Likely range +0.66 to +1.65

Attack and defense

Attack +0.85: scores 0.85 more goals a game than an average D2 team.

Defense +0.29: concedes 0.29 fewer goals a game than an average D2 team.

Attack + defense = rating.

What it takes to make the NCAA tournament

There are two ways in. How qualifying works.

How many more wins it needs

Its last 8 games against D2 teams: how many it might win, and its NCAA chance in each case. A tie counts as half a win.

WinsHow likelyNCAA chance then
0 under 1% –
1 under 1% –
2 2% –
3 11% about 25%
4 22% about 45%
5 31% about 70%
6 20% about 95%
7 12% over 99%
8 (all) 1% over 99%

– means too few simulated seasons to say. Which games are won matters as well as how many: wins over strong teams and away wins count for more.

If Fort Lewis wins all 8: it makes the NCAA tournament as an at-large team, even without the conference title.

Rating over the season

Line: rating after each daily update. Shaded: likely range. Above 0 is better than an average D2 team.

0+1.0+2.0+3.0Oct

How sure is the rank?

Taller bars are more likely. Fort Lewis likely (8 in 10) ranks between 4th and 41st.

1152943577185better rank →

Still to play

win tie loss chances for each game. A tie can be the likeliest single score even when a win is more likely overall.

Oct 2 v Westminster (UT) W 60% · T 21% · L 19% likeliest 1–0
Oct 4 v Colorado Mesa W 64% · T 17% · L 19% likeliest 2–1
Oct 8 at UCCS W 36% · T 21% · L 43% likeliest 1–1
Oct 11 at CSU Pueblo W 31% · T 24% · L 45% likeliest 1–1
Oct 18 at Colo. Sch. of Mines W 77% · T 13% · L 10% likeliest 2–0
Oct 23 v South Dakota Mines W 81% · T 11% · L 8% likeliest 3–0
Oct 25 v Regis (CO) W 46% · T 24% · L 31% likeliest 1–1
Oct 28 v Adams St. W 98% · T 1% · L 0% likeliest 6–0

Results

How much each result changed the rating. A win can lower it if the model expected a bigger win; a narrow loss to a strong team can raise it.

Sep 27 at MSU Denver W 2–1 Rating +0.04
Sep 25 at Colo. Christian W 3–0 Rating +0.05
Sep 20 v CSU Pueblo L 1–3 Rating −0.08
Sep 17 at Colorado Mesa T 1–1 Rating −0.04
Sep 10 at Northwest Nazarene L 0–1 Rating −0.07
Sep 6 at Fort Hays St. T 1–1 Rating +0.04
Sep 3 v St. Edward's W 3–1 Rating +0.04
Aug 29 at West Tex. A&M W 7–0 Rating +0.25
Aug 27 at Lubbock Christian W 2–1 Rating +0.01