D2 Men's Soccer Ratings

Updated Oct 2, 6:34 a.m. ET · 2026 season · 915 games between D2 teams so far

Rankings · Rocky Mountain Athletic Conference · Super Region 4

University of Colorado Colorado Springs

Ranked 12th of 202 D2 teams (likely between 6th and 50th) and 2nd of 11 in the RMAC. 69% chance of making the NCAA tournament, mostly through an at-large place.

Record 5-1-4 (W-L-T) · 5-1-4 against D2 teams

NCAA tournament chance

69%

With 5 or more wins from its last 8 games against D2 teams, its NCAA chance is about 89%; with fewer, about 36%.

Top-four seed in Super Region 4 (first chance to host games): 31%

Rank

12 of 202

Likely between 6th and 50th

2nd of 11 in the RMAC (likely 1st to 5th)

Rating

+1.01

Would beat an average D2 team by about 1.0 goals a game, on a neutral field.

Likely range +0.55 to +1.52

Attack and defense

Attack +0.73: scores 0.73 more goals a game than an average D2 team.

Defense +0.30: concedes 0.30 fewer goals a game than an average D2 team.

Attack + defense = rating.

What it takes to make the NCAA tournament

There are two ways in. How qualifying works.

How many more wins it needs

Its last 8 games against D2 teams: how many it might win, and its NCAA chance in each case. A tie counts as half a win.

WinsHow likelyNCAA chance then
0 under 1% –
1 under 1% –
2 2% under 5%
3 10% about 20%
4 25% about 45%
5 27% about 75%
6 24% about 95%
7 10% over 99%
8 (all) 2% over 99%

– means too few simulated seasons to say. Which games are won matters as well as how many: wins over strong teams and away wins count for more.

If UCCS wins all 8: it makes the NCAA tournament as an at-large team, even without the conference title.

Rating over the season

Line: rating after each daily update. Shaded: likely range. Above 0 is better than an average D2 team.

0+1.0+2.0+3.0Oct

How sure is the rank?

Taller bars are more likely. UCCS likely (8 in 10) ranks between 6th and 50th.

1163146617691better rank →

Still to play

win tie loss chances for each game. A tie can be the likeliest single score even when a win is more likely overall.

Oct 2 v South Dakota Mines W 79% · T 12% · L 9% likeliest 2–0
Oct 4 v Regis (CO) W 43% · T 24% · L 32% likeliest 1–1
Oct 8 v Fort Lewis W 43% · T 21% · L 36% likeliest 1–1
Oct 11 at Adams St. W 96% · T 3% · L 1% likeliest 5–0
Oct 16 at Colo. Christian W 71% · T 16% · L 13% likeliest 2–0
Oct 18 at MSU Denver W 41% · T 24% · L 34% likeliest 1–1
Oct 25 v Colo. Sch. of Mines W 83% · T 11% · L 7% likeliest 3–0
Oct 28 v CSU Pueblo W 38% · T 24% · L 37% likeliest 1–1

Results

How much each result changed the rating. A win can lower it if the model expected a bigger win; a narrow loss to a strong team can raise it.

Sep 27 at Westminster (UT) T 1–1 Rating −0.02
Sep 24 at Colorado Mesa L 2–3 Rating −0.06
Sep 20 at Regis (CO) W 2–1 Rating +0.05
Sep 17 v MSU Denver T 2–2 Rating −0.02
Sep 12 at Simon Fraser T 1–1 Rating −0.03
Sep 9 v Hawaii Hilo W 2–1 Rating +0.01
Sep 6 v Lubbock Christian W 2–1 Rating −0.00
Sep 4 v Midwestern St. T 1–1 Rating +0.03
Aug 29 at St. Mary's (TX) W 3–0 Rating +0.12
Aug 27 at Sul Ross St. W 8–0 Rating +0.22