D2 Men's Soccer Ratings

Updated Oct 2, 6:34 a.m. ET · 2026 season · 915 games between D2 teams so far

Rankings · Rocky Mountain Athletic Conference · Super Region 4

Colorado Mesa University

Ranked 75th of 202 D2 teams (likely between 33rd and 127th) and 6th of 11 in the RMAC. 16% chance of making the NCAA tournament, mostly through an at-large place.

Record 3-1-5 (W-L-T) · 3-1-5 against D2 teams

NCAA tournament chance

16%

With 4 or more wins from its last 8 games against D2 teams, its NCAA chance is about 25%; with fewer, about 3%.

Top-four seed in Super Region 4 (first chance to host games): 2%

Rank

75 of 202

Likely between 33rd and 127th

6th of 11 in the RMAC (likely 4th to 7th)

Rating

+0.29

Would beat an average D2 team by about 0.3 goals a game, on a neutral field.

Likely range −0.20 to +0.76

Attack and defense

Attack +0.29: scores 0.29 more goals a game than an average D2 team.

Defense +0.00: concedes 0.00 fewer goals a game than an average D2 team.

Attack + defense = rating.

What it takes to make the NCAA tournament

There are two ways in. How qualifying works.

How many more wins it needs

Its last 8 games against D2 teams: how many it might win, and its NCAA chance in each case. A tie counts as half a win.

WinsHow likelyNCAA chance then
0 under 1% –
1 3% under 5%
2 13% under 5%
3 25% under 5%
4 28% about 10%
5 21% about 25%
6 7% about 60%
7 2% about 85%
8 (all) under 1% over 99%

– means too few simulated seasons to say. Which games are won matters as well as how many: wins over strong teams and away wins count for more.

If Colorado Mesa wins all 8: it makes the NCAA tournament as an at-large team, even without the conference title.

Rating over the season

Line: rating after each daily update. Shaded: likely range. Above 0 is better than an average D2 team.

−1.0−0.50+0.5+1.0Oct

How sure is the rank?

Taller bars are more likely. Colorado Mesa likely (8 in 10) ranks between 33rd and 127th.

9345984109134159better rank →

Still to play

win tie loss chances for each game. A tie can be the likeliest single score even when a win is more likely overall.

Oct 2 at Adams St. W 90% · T 7% · L 4% likeliest 3–0
Oct 4 at Fort Lewis W 19% · T 17% · L 64% likeliest 1–2
Oct 11 v Colo. Sch. of Mines W 69% · T 16% · L 15% likeliest 2–1
Oct 16 at Regis (CO) W 21% · T 22% · L 57% likeliest 0–1
Oct 18 at South Dakota Mines W 55% · T 20% · L 25% likeliest 2–1
Oct 23 v Colo. Christian W 65% · T 18% · L 17% likeliest 2–1
Oct 25 at MSU Denver W 27% · T 23% · L 50% likeliest 1–1
Oct 28 v Westminster (UT) W 42% · T 25% · L 34% likeliest 1–1

Results

How much each result changed the rating. A win can lower it if the model expected a bigger win; a narrow loss to a strong team can raise it.

Sep 27 v CSU Pueblo T 1–1 Rating +0.03
Sep 24 v UCCS W 3–2 Rating +0.06
Sep 20 at Colo. Christian W 3–0 Rating +0.10
Sep 17 v Fort Lewis T 1–1 Rating +0.05
Sep 12 at Northwest Nazarene W 2–0 Rating +0.11
Sep 5 v UC Merced T 1–1 Rating −0.03
Sep 3 v Jamestown T 2–2 Rating −0.09
Aug 29 v Midwestern St. L 1–6 Rating −0.17
Aug 27 at UT Dallas T 1–1 Rating +0.02