D2 Men's Soccer Ratings

Updated Oct 2, 6:34 a.m. ET · 2026 season · 915 games between D2 teams so far

Rankings · Lone Star Conference · Super Region 4

West Texas A&M University

Ranked 152nd of 202 D2 teams (likely between 116th and 174th) and 10th of 11 in the Lone Star. 0% chance of making the NCAA tournament, mostly by winning the Lone Star tournament.

Record 3-6-1 (W-L-T) · 3-6-1 against D2 teams

NCAA tournament chance

0%

Most of its chance comes from winning the Lone Star tournament (the auto bid).

Rank

152 of 202

Likely between 116th and 174th

10th of 11 in the Lone Star (likely 8th to 10th)

Rating

−0.50

Would lose to an average D2 team by about 0.5 goals a game, on a neutral field.

Likely range −0.95 to −0.10

Attack and defense

Attack −0.26: scores 0.26 fewer goals a game than an average D2 team.

Defense −0.23: concedes 0.23 more goals a game than an average D2 team.

Attack + defense = rating.

What it takes to make the NCAA tournament

There are two ways in. How qualifying works.

How many more wins it needs

Its last 7 games against D2 teams: how many it might win, and its NCAA chance in each case. A tie counts as half a win.

WinsHow likelyNCAA chance then
0 11% under 5%
1 29% under 5%
2 35% under 5%
3 18% under 5%
4 5% under 5%
5 2% –
6 under 1% –
7 (all) under 1% under 5%

– means too few simulated seasons to say. Which games are won matters as well as how many: wins over strong teams and away wins count for more.

If West Tex. A&M wins all 7: its NPI would still fall short of the cut line, so it would also need to win the Lone Star tournament.

Rating over the season

Line: rating after each daily update. Shaded: likely range. Above 0 is better than an average D2 team.

−1.5−1.0−0.50+0.5Oct

How sure is the rank?

Taller bars are more likely. West Tex. A&M likely (8 in 10) ranks between 116th and 174th.

81100119138157176better rank →

Still to play

win tie loss chances for each game. A tie can be the likeliest single score even when a win is more likely overall.

Oct 3 v UT Dallas W 22% · T 24% · L 54% likeliest 0–1
Oct 10 at DBU W 19% · T 24% · L 57% likeliest 0–1
Oct 14 at Lubbock Christian W 21% · T 25% · L 54% likeliest 0–1
Oct 17 v Midwestern St. W 6% · T 12% · L 82% likeliest 0–2
Oct 21 v Sul Ross St. W 64% · T 19% · L 16% likeliest 2–0
Oct 24 at St. Mary's (TX) W 16% · T 21% · L 64% likeliest 0–1
Oct 28 v St. Edward's W 26% · T 23% · L 51% likeliest 1–1

Results

How much each result changed the rating. A win can lower it if the model expected a bigger win; a narrow loss to a strong team can raise it.

Sep 30 at Okla. Christian L 0–2 Rating −0.03
Sep 26 v UT Tyler W 3–1 Rating +0.07
Sep 23 at Tex. A&M Int'l T 0–0 Rating +0.05
Sep 19 v Saint Martin's L 1–4 Rating −0.18
Sep 17 v Northwest Nazarene L 0–1 Rating +0.01
Sep 12 v Newman W 1–0 Rating +0.08
Sep 5 at Southern Nazarene L 0–1 Rating +0.04
Sep 1 at Colo. Christian L 0–3 Rating −0.13
Aug 29 v Fort Lewis L 0–7 Rating −0.27
Aug 27 v Adams St. W 4–0 Rating +0.08