D2 Men's Soccer Ratings

Updated Oct 2, 6:34 a.m. ET · 2026 season · 915 games between D2 teams so far

Rankings · Gulf South Conference · Super Region 2

Mississippi Christian University

Ranked 67th of 202 D2 teams (likely between 18th and 118th) and 3rd of 11 in the Gulf South. 9% chance of making the NCAA tournament, mostly by winning the Gulf South tournament.

Record 2-4-2 (W-L-T) · 2-4-2 against D2 teams

NCAA tournament chance

9%

Most of its chance comes from winning the Gulf South tournament (the auto bid).

Top-four seed in Super Region 2 (first chance to host games): <1%

Rank

67 of 202

Likely between 18th and 118th

3rd of 11 in the Gulf South (likely 1st to 7th)

Rating

+0.39

Would beat an average D2 team by about 0.4 goals a game, on a neutral field.

Likely range −0.12 to +1.00

Attack and defense

Attack +0.65: scores 0.65 more goals a game than an average D2 team.

Defense −0.24: concedes 0.24 more goals a game than an average D2 team.

Attack + defense = rating.

What it takes to make the NCAA tournament

There are two ways in. How qualifying works.

How many more wins it needs

Its last 6 games against D2 teams: how many it might win, and its NCAA chance in each case. A tie counts as half a win.

WinsHow likelyNCAA chance then
0 2% –
1 10% under 5%
2 24% about 5%
3 34% about 10%
4 20% about 10%
5 8% about 20%
6 (all) 2% under 5%

– means too few simulated seasons to say. Which games are won matters as well as how many: wins over strong teams and away wins count for more.

If Mississippi Christian wins all 6: its NPI would still fall short of the cut line, so it would also need to win the Gulf South tournament.

Rating over the season

Line: rating after each daily update. Shaded: likely range. Above 0 is better than an average D2 team.

−0.50+0.5+1.0+1.5Oct

How sure is the rank?

Taller bars are more likely. Mississippi Christian likely (8 in 10) ranks between 18th and 118th.

5315783109135better rank →

Still to play

win tie loss chances for each game. A tie can be the likeliest single score even when a win is more likely overall.

Oct 3 v AUM W 30% · T 20% · L 50% likeliest 1–1
Oct 7 at Spring Hill W 67% · T 16% · L 17% likeliest 2–1
Oct 10 v Montevallo W 56% · T 19% · L 25% likeliest 2–1
Oct 14 at Delta St. W 66% · T 17% · L 17% likeliest 2–1
Oct 17 v West Ala. W 52% · T 18% · L 30% likeliest 2–1
Oct 23 at UAH W 26% · T 22% · L 52% likeliest 1–1

Results

How much each result changed the rating. A win can lower it if the model expected a bigger win; a narrow loss to a strong team can raise it.

Sep 26 at Lee L 1–2 Rating −0.05
Sep 23 v Christian Brothers T 2–2 Rating −0.03
Sep 19 at Trevecca Nazarene L 2–6 Rating −0.28
Sep 12 v Union (TN) W 3–1 Rating +0.03
Sep 6 v Fla. Southern L 1–2 Rating −0.06
Sep 4 v Eckerd W 3–0 Rating +0.07
Aug 30 v Saint Leo T 1–1 Rating −0.03
Aug 27 at Lynn L 2–3 Rating +0.03