D2 Men's Soccer Ratings

Updated Oct 2, 6:34 a.m. ET · 2026 season · 915 games between D2 teams so far

Rankings · Gulf South Conference · Super Region 2

University of West Alabama

Ranked 97th of 202 D2 teams (likely between 47th and 138th) and 5th of 11 in the Gulf South. 6% chance of making the NCAA tournament, mostly by winning the Gulf South tournament.

Record 3-5-2 (W-L-T) · 3-5-2 against D2 teams

Compare with another team

NCAA tournament chance

6%

Most of its chance comes from winning the Gulf South tournament (the auto bid).

Top-four seed in Super Region 2 (first chance to host games): <1%

Rank

97 of 202

Likely between 47th and 138th

5th of 11 in the Gulf South (likely 2nd to 8th)

Rating

+0.13

Would beat an average D2 team by about 0.1 goals a game, on a neutral field.

Likely range −0.34 to +0.58

Attack and defense

Attack +0.27: scores 0.27 more goals a game than an average D2 team.

Defense −0.13: concedes 0.13 more goals a game than an average D2 team.

Attack + defense = rating.

What it takes to make the NCAA tournament

There are two ways in. How qualifying works.

How many more wins it needs

Its last 6 games against D2 teams: how many it might win, and its NCAA chance in each case. A tie counts as half a win.

WinsHow likelyNCAA chance then
0 6% under 5%
1 18% under 5%
2 29% under 5%
3 27% about 10%
4 14% about 10%
5 5% about 10%
6 (all) 1% under 5%

– means too few simulated seasons to say. Which games are won matters as well as how many: wins over strong teams and away wins count for more.

If West Ala. wins all 6: its NPI would still fall short of the cut line, so it would also need to win the Gulf South tournament.

Rating over the season

Line: rating after each daily update. Shaded: likely range. Above 0 is better than an average D2 team.

−1.0−0.50+0.5+1.0Oct

How sure is the rank?

Taller bars are more likely. West Ala. likely (8 in 10) ranks between 47th and 138th.

13406794121148175better rank →

Still to play

win tie loss chances for each game. A tie can be the likeliest single score even when a win is more likely overall.

Oct 2 v Christian Brothers W 44% · T 22% · L 34% likeliest 1–1 · compare
Oct 7 at AUM W 18% · T 19% · L 63% likeliest 1–2 · compare
Oct 10 v Union (TN) W 61% · T 19% · L 19% likeliest 2–1 · compare
Oct 14 v Montevallo W 49% · T 21% · L 30% likeliest 1–1 · compare
Oct 17 at Mississippi Christian W 30% · T 18% · L 52% likeliest 1–2 · compare
Oct 23 at Trevecca Nazarene W 35% · T 21% · L 44% likeliest 1–1 · compare

Results

How much each result changed the rating. A win can lower it if the model expected a bigger win; a narrow loss to a strong team can raise it.

Sep 26 at Spring Hill T 1–1 Rating −0.03
Sep 23 v Delta St. W 4–0 Rating +0.11
Sep 20 v Harding W 8–2 Rating +0.13
Sep 16 at Lee L 0–1 Rating −0.02
Sep 13 v Tuskegee W 8–1 Rating +0.17
Sep 11 v UAH L 1–2 Rating −0.03
Sep 5 at Ga. Southwestern L 0–2 Rating −0.11
Sep 3 at Middle Georgia L 2–3 Rating −0.13
Aug 31 v Tex. A&M Int'l L 0–2 Rating −0.13
Aug 27 v Tampa T 3–3 Rating −0.03