D2 Men's Soccer Ratings

Updated Oct 2, 6:34 a.m. ET · 2026 season · 915 games between D2 teams so far

Rankings · Conference Carolinas · Super Region 2

University of Mount Olive

Ranked 183rd of 202 D2 teams (likely between 157th and 195th) and 13th of 15 in the Carolinas. <1% chance of making the NCAA tournament.

Record 2-7-0 (W-L-T) · 2-7-0 against D2 teams

NCAA tournament chance

<1%

Very unlikely to make the NCAA tournament, even with 7 games against D2 teams left.

Rank

183 of 202

Likely between 157th and 195th

13th of 15 in the Carolinas (likely 11th to 14th)

Rating

−1.20

Would lose to an average D2 team by about 1.2 goals a game, on a neutral field.

Likely range −1.85 to −0.62

Attack and defense

Attack −0.08: scores 0.08 fewer goals a game than an average D2 team.

Defense −1.14: concedes 1.14 more goals a game than an average D2 team.

Attack + defense = rating.

What it takes to make the NCAA tournament

There are two ways in. How qualifying works.

How many more wins it needs

Its last 7 games against D2 teams: how many it might win, and its NCAA chance in each case. A tie counts as half a win.

WinsHow likelyNCAA chance then
0 23% under 5%
1 38% under 5%
2 27% under 5%
3 9% under 5%
4 2% –
5 under 1% –
6 under 1% –
7 (all) under 1% under 5%

– means too few simulated seasons to say. Which games are won matters as well as how many: wins over strong teams and away wins count for more.

If Mount Olive wins all 7: its NPI would still fall short of the cut line, so it would also need to win the Carolinas tournament.

Rating over the season

Line: rating after each daily update. Shaded: likely range. Above 0 is better than an average D2 team.

−2.0−1.5−1.0−0.50Oct

How sure is the rank?

Taller bars are more likely. Mount Olive likely (8 in 10) ranks between 157th and 195th.

111126141156171186201better rank →

Still to play

win tie loss chances for each game. A tie can be the likeliest single score even when a win is more likely overall.

Oct 3 at Young Harris W 6% · T 8% · L 87% likeliest 0–4
Oct 7 at Francis Marion W 7% · T 12% · L 81% likeliest 0–2
Oct 10 v Ferrum W 34% · T 21% · L 46% likeliest 1–1
Oct 14 at Wingate W 12% · T 14% · L 74% likeliest 1–2
Oct 17 v Barton W 43% · T 19% · L 38% likeliest 2–2
Oct 20 v Chowan W 13% · T 12% · L 76% likeliest 1–3
Oct 24 v Francis Marion W 11% · T 15% · L 74% likeliest 0–2

Results

How much each result changed the rating. A win can lower it if the model expected a bigger win; a narrow loss to a strong team can raise it.

Sep 30 at Barton L 2–4 Rating −0.12
Sep 26 v Converse L 3–6 Rating −0.19
Sep 22 at Chowan L 2–3 Rating +0.13
Sep 19 v Lees-McRae L 1–5 Rating −0.22
Sep 16 at Ferrum L 0–2 Rating −0.03
Sep 12 at Belmont Abbey W 3–2 Rating +0.10
Sep 9 v Anderson (SC) L 0–4 Rating −0.09
Sep 1 v Shaw W 7–1 Rating +0.19
Aug 30 at Mars Hill L 0–6 Rating −0.24