D2 Men's Soccer Ratings

Updated Oct 2, 6:34 a.m. ET · 2026 season · 915 games between D2 teams so far

Rankings · Central Atlantic Collegiate Conference · Super Region 1

Thomas Jefferson University

Ranked 143rd of 202 D2 teams (likely between 94th and 170th) and 8th of 11 in the CACC. 2% chance of making the NCAA tournament, mostly by winning the CACC tournament.

Record 2-6-0 (W-L-T) · 1-6-0 against D2 teams

Compare with another team

NCAA tournament chance

2%

Most of its chance comes from winning the CACC tournament (the auto bid).

Rank

143 of 202

Likely between 94th and 170th

8th of 11 in the CACC (likely 5th to 9th)

Rating

−0.33

Would lose to an average D2 team by about 0.3 goals a game, on a neutral field.

Likely range −0.86 to +0.13

Attack and defense

Attack −0.09: scores 0.09 fewer goals a game than an average D2 team.

Defense −0.24: concedes 0.24 more goals a game than an average D2 team.

Attack + defense = rating.

What it takes to make the NCAA tournament

There are two ways in. How qualifying works.

How many more wins it needs

Its last 7 games against D2 teams: how many it might win, and its NCAA chance in each case. A tie counts as half a win.

WinsHow likelyNCAA chance then
0 6% under 5%
1 25% under 5%
2 31% under 5%
3 24% under 5%
4 10% about 5%
5 3% under 5%
6 under 1% –
7 (all) under 1% under 5%

– means too few simulated seasons to say. Which games are won matters as well as how many: wins over strong teams and away wins count for more.

If Jefferson wins all 7: its NPI would still fall short of the cut line, so it would also need to win the CACC tournament.

Rating over the season

Line: rating after each daily update. Shaded: likely range. Above 0 is better than an average D2 team.

−1.0−0.50+0.5Oct

How sure is the rank?

Taller bars are more likely. Jefferson likely (8 in 10) ranks between 94th and 170th.

446994119144169better rank →

Still to play

win tie loss chances for each game. A tie can be the likeliest single score even when a win is more likely overall.

Oct 3 at Caldwell W 32% · T 22% · L 46% likeliest 1–1 · compare
Oct 7 at Chestnut Hill W 57% · T 20% · L 23% likeliest 2–1 · compare
Oct 11 at Felician W 16% · T 17% · L 67% likeliest 1–2 · compare
Oct 13 v Holy Family W 41% · T 24% · L 35% likeliest 1–1 · compare
Oct 17 at Post W 14% · T 22% · L 64% likeliest 0–1 · compare
Oct 21 v Georgian Court W 38% · T 21% · L 41% likeliest 1–1 · compare
Oct 24 v Monroe Not ratednot a D2 team, not rated
Oct 27 at Wilmington (DE) W 16% · T 17% · L 66% likeliest 1–2 · compare

Results

How much each result changed the rating. A win can lower it if the model expected a bigger win; a narrow loss to a strong team can raise it.

Sep 29 v Goldey-Beacom W 4–2 Rating +0.01
Sep 22 v Bry. & Strat. (Roc.) · not a D2 team, not rated W 6–1
Sep 19 at Dominican (NY) L 1–2 Rating −0.07
Sep 12 v Pace L 0–1 Rating −0.03
Sep 9 at Dist. Columbia L 0–1 Rating −0.01
Sep 5 at Southern N.H. L 2–7 Rating −0.13
Sep 2 v East Stroudsburg L 0–2 Rating −0.04
Aug 29 at Bloomsburg L 1–3 Rating −0.07