D2 Men's Soccer Ratings

Updated Oct 2, 6:34 a.m. ET · 2026 season · 915 games between D2 teams so far

Rankings · Central Atlantic Collegiate Conference · Super Region 1

Georgian Court University

Ranked 117th of 202 D2 teams (likely between 68th and 155th) and 5th of 11 in the CACC. 10% chance of making the NCAA tournament, mostly by winning the CACC tournament.

Record 5-2-2 (W-L-T) · 5-2-2 against D2 teams

NCAA tournament chance

10%

Most of its chance comes from winning the CACC tournament (the auto bid).

Top-four seed in Super Region 1 (first chance to host games): <1%

Rank

117 of 202

Likely between 68th and 155th

5th of 11 in the CACC (likely 4th to 8th)

Rating

−0.06

Would lose to an average D2 team by about 0.1 goals a game, on a neutral field.

Likely range −0.58 to +0.36

Attack and defense

Attack +0.23: scores 0.23 more goals a game than an average D2 team.

Defense −0.29: concedes 0.29 more goals a game than an average D2 team.

Attack + defense = rating.

What it takes to make the NCAA tournament

There are two ways in. How qualifying works.

How many more wins it needs

Its last 8 games against D2 teams: how many it might win, and its NCAA chance in each case. A tie counts as half a win.

WinsHow likelyNCAA chance then
0 2% –
1 8% under 5%
2 19% under 5%
3 28% under 5%
4 22% about 10%
5 14% about 20%
6 6% about 30%
7 1% –
8 (all) 1% about 95%

– means too few simulated seasons to say. Which games are won matters as well as how many: wins over strong teams and away wins count for more.

If Georgian Court wins all 8: its NPI clears the cut line in 97% of simulated seasons, without needing the conference title.

Rating over the season

Line: rating after each daily update. Shaded: likely range. Above 0 is better than an average D2 team.

−1.0−0.50+0.5+1.0Oct

How sure is the rank?

Taller bars are more likely. Georgian Court likely (8 in 10) ranks between 68th and 155th.

305580105130155180better rank →

Still to play

win tie loss chances for each game. A tie can be the likeliest single score even when a win is more likely overall.

Oct 2 v Felician W 29% · T 20% · L 51% likeliest 1–2
Oct 3 v Monroe Not ratednot a D2 team, not rated
Oct 6 at Holy Family W 39% · T 22% · L 39% likeliest 1–1
Oct 10 v Bridgeport W 32% · T 19% · L 49% likeliest 1–2
Oct 13 v Wilmington (DE) W 30% · T 20% · L 51% likeliest 1–2
Oct 17 at Caldwell W 39% · T 21% · L 40% likeliest 1–1
Oct 21 at Jefferson W 41% · T 21% · L 38% likeliest 1–1
Oct 24 at Dominican (NY) W 54% · T 21% · L 25% likeliest 1–1
Oct 27 v Goldey-Beacom W 72% · T 14% · L 14% likeliest 3–1

Results

How much each result changed the rating. A win can lower it if the model expected a bigger win; a narrow loss to a strong team can raise it.

Sep 29 at Chestnut Hill W 3–2 Rating −0.02
Sep 23 at Millersville L 0–4 Rating −0.11
Sep 19 v Post W 1–0 Rating +0.09
Sep 16 v Roberts Wesleyan W 5–2 Rating +0.06
Sep 12 at Queens (NY) L 1–3 Rating −0.01
Sep 6 at Pitt.-Johnstown W 5–2 Rating +0.01
Sep 3 v Staten Island W 4–1 Rating +0.09
Aug 29 at Saint Michael's T 2–2 Rating −0.00
Aug 27 at Bentley T 1–1 Rating +0.06