D2 Men's Soccer Ratings

Updated Oct 2, 6:34 a.m. ET · 2026 season · 915 games between D2 teams so far

Rankings · Pennsylvania State Athletic Conference · Super Region 1

Millersville University of Pennsylvania

Ranked 16th of 202 D2 teams (likely between 8th and 49th) and 2nd of 12 in the PSAC. 69% chance of making the NCAA tournament, mostly through an at-large place.

Record 8-2-1 (W-L-T) · 8-2-0 against D2 teams

NCAA tournament chance

69%

With 3 or more wins from its last 6 games against D2 teams, its NCAA chance is about 83%; with fewer, about 28%.

Top-four seed in Super Region 1 (first chance to host games): 16%

Rank

16 of 202

Likely between 8th and 49th

2nd of 12 in the PSAC (likely 1st to 4th)

Rating

+0.96

Would beat an average D2 team by about 1.0 goals a game, on a neutral field.

Likely range +0.55 to +1.34

Attack and defense

Attack +0.48: scores 0.48 more goals a game than an average D2 team.

Defense +0.49: concedes 0.49 fewer goals a game than an average D2 team.

Attack + defense = rating.

What it takes to make the NCAA tournament

There are two ways in. How qualifying works.

How many more wins it needs

Its last 6 games against D2 teams: how many it might win, and its NCAA chance in each case. A tie counts as half a win.

WinsHow likelyNCAA chance then
0 1% –
1 6% about 20%
2 18% about 30%
3 30% about 70%
4 28% about 90%
5 14% over 99%
6 (all) 3% over 99%

– means too few simulated seasons to say. Which games are won matters as well as how many: wins over strong teams and away wins count for more.

If Millersville wins all 6: it makes the NCAA tournament as an at-large team, even without the conference title.

Rating over the season

Line: rating after each daily update. Shaded: likely range. Above 0 is better than an average D2 team.

0+0.5+1.0+1.5+2.0Oct

How sure is the rank?

Taller bars are more likely. Millersville likely (8 in 10) ranks between 8th and 49th.

21528415467better rank →

Still to play

win tie loss chances for each game. A tie can be the likeliest single score even when a win is more likely overall.

Oct 7 at West Chester W 42% · T 28% · L 30% likeliest 1–0
Oct 10 v St. Thomas Aquinas W 56% · T 23% · L 21% likeliest 1–0
Oct 14 v Shepherd W 65% · T 20% · L 15% likeliest 1–0
Oct 17 at Bloomsburg W 44% · T 27% · L 29% likeliest 1–0
Oct 21 at East Stroudsburg W 43% · T 25% · L 31% likeliest 1–1
Oct 24 v Lackawanna Not ratednot a D2 team, not rated
Oct 29 v Shippensburg W 80% · T 13% · L 7% likeliest 2–0

Results

How much each result changed the rating. A win can lower it if the model expected a bigger win; a narrow loss to a strong team can raise it.

Sep 30 at Shippensburg W 1–0 Rating −0.03
Sep 26 v Bloomsburg W 3–2 Rating +0.01
Sep 23 v Georgian Court W 4–0 Rating +0.10
Sep 19 v East Stroudsburg L 0–1 Rating −0.06
Sep 16 v West Chester W 2–1 Rating +0.01
Sep 12 at Lackawanna · not a D2 team, not rated T 0–0
Sep 9 at Shepherd W 1–0 Rating +0.02
Sep 5 at Salem (WV) W 3–0 Rating +0.05
Sep 2 at California (PA) W 7–1 Rating +0.14
Aug 30 v Ashland L 0–2 Rating −0.14
Aug 27 v Holy Family W 5–0 Rating +0.14