D2 Men's Soccer Ratings

Updated Oct 2, 6:34 a.m. ET · 2026 season · 915 games between D2 teams so far

Rankings · Great Northwest Athletic Conference · Super Region 4

Western Washington University

Ranked 70th of 202 D2 teams (likely between 31st and 111th) and 3rd of 6 in the GNAC. 24% chance of making the NCAA tournament.

Record 6-3-2 (W-L-T) · 6-3-2 against D2 teams

Compare with another team

NCAA tournament chance

24%

With 4 or more wins from its last 8 games against D2 teams, its NCAA chance is about 37%; with fewer, about 9%.

Top-four seed in Super Region 4 (first chance to host games): 2%

Rank

70 of 202

Likely between 31st and 111th

3rd of 6 in the GNAC (likely 2nd to 5th)

Rating

+0.35

Would beat an average D2 team by about 0.4 goals a game, on a neutral field.

Likely range −0.05 to +0.76

Attack and defense

Attack +0.19: scores 0.19 more goals a game than an average D2 team.

Defense +0.17: concedes 0.17 fewer goals a game than an average D2 team.

Attack + defense = rating.

What it takes to make the NCAA tournament

There are two ways in. How qualifying works.

How many more wins it needs

Its last 8 games against D2 teams: how many it might win, and its NCAA chance in each case. A tie counts as half a win.

WinsHow likelyNCAA chance then
0 1% –
1 4% about 10%
2 16% about 10%
3 26% about 10%
4 25% about 15%
5 20% about 40%
6 7% about 85%
7 1% –
8 (all) under 1% over 99%

– means too few simulated seasons to say. Which games are won matters as well as how many: wins over strong teams and away wins count for more.

If Western Wash. wins all 8: it makes the NCAA tournament as an at-large team, even without the conference title.

Rating over the season

Line: rating after each daily update. Shaded: likely range. Above 0 is better than an average D2 team.

−0.50+0.5+1.0+1.5Oct

How sure is the rank?

Taller bars are more likely. Western Wash. likely (8 in 10) ranks between 31st and 111th.

9345984109134159better rank →

Still to play

win tie loss chances for each game. A tie can be the likeliest single score even when a win is more likely overall.

Oct 3 v Seattle Pacific W 33% · T 23% · L 44% likeliest 1–1 · compare
Oct 8 at Simon Fraser W 38% · T 26% · L 36% likeliest 1–1 · compare
Oct 15 at Northwest Nazarene W 36% · T 24% · L 40% likeliest 1–1 · compare
Oct 17 at Seattle Pacific W 24% · T 21% · L 54% likeliest 1–1 · compare
Oct 22 v Simon Fraser W 47% · T 25% · L 28% likeliest 1–1 · compare
Oct 24 v Jamestown W 82% · T 10% · L 7% likeliest 3–0 · compare
Oct 29 v Saint Martin's W 78% · T 13% · L 9% likeliest 2–0 · compare
Oct 31 v Western Ore. W 34% · T 24% · L 42% likeliest 1–1 · compare

Results

How much each result changed the rating. A win can lower it if the model expected a bigger win; a narrow loss to a strong team can raise it.

Oct 1 v Northwest Nazarene T 2–2 Rating −0.02
Sep 26 at Western Ore. L 2–3 Rating −0.02
Sep 24 at Saint Martin's W 1–0 Rating −0.01
Sep 18 at DBU L 1–2 Rating −0.03
Sep 16 at St. Edward's W 2–0 Rating +0.08
Sep 13 at Regis (CO) T 1–1 Rating +0.03
Sep 10 at Westminster (UT) L 1–3 Rating −0.08
Sep 5 v Westmont W 2–0 Rating +0.04
Sep 3 v Point Loma W 2–1 Rating +0.05
Aug 29 v Stanislaus St. W 2–1 Rating +0.04
Aug 27 v Chico St. W 3–2 Rating +0.01