D2 Men's Soccer Ratings

Updated Oct 2, 6:34 a.m. ET · 2026 season · 915 games between D2 teams so far

Rankings · South Atlantic Conference · Super Region 2

Catawba College

Ranked 30th of 202 D2 teams (likely between 15th and 83rd) and 2nd of 11 in the SAC. 52% chance of making the NCAA tournament, mostly through an at-large place.

Record 7-0-2 (W-L-T) · 7-0-2 against D2 teams

Compare with another team

NCAA tournament chance

52%

With 3 or more wins from its last 7 games against D2 teams, its NCAA chance is about 70%; with fewer, about 23%.

Top-four seed in Super Region 2 (first chance to host games): 24%

Rank

30 of 202

Likely between 15th and 83rd

2nd of 11 in the SAC (likely 1st to 6th)

Rating

+0.66

Would beat an average D2 team by about 0.7 goals a game, on a neutral field.

Likely range +0.22 to +1.12

Attack and defense

Attack +0.40: scores 0.40 more goals a game than an average D2 team.

Defense +0.26: concedes 0.26 fewer goals a game than an average D2 team.

Attack + defense = rating.

What it takes to make the NCAA tournament

There are two ways in. How qualifying works.

How many more wins it needs

Its last 7 games against D2 teams: how many it might win, and its NCAA chance in each case. A tie counts as half a win.

WinsHow likelyNCAA chance then
0 2% –
1 13% about 15%
2 22% about 30%
3 28% about 50%
4 21% about 80%
5 11% about 100%
6 3% over 99%
7 (all) 1% over 99%

– means too few simulated seasons to say. Which games are won matters as well as how many: wins over strong teams and away wins count for more.

If Catawba wins all 7: it makes the NCAA tournament as an at-large team, even without the conference title.

Rating over the season

Line: rating after each daily update. Shaded: likely range. Above 0 is better than an average D2 team.

−1.0−0.50+0.5+1.0+1.5Oct

How sure is the rank?

Taller bars are more likely. Catawba likely (8 in 10) ranks between 15th and 83rd.

324456687108129better rank →

Still to play

win tie loss chances for each game. A tie can be the likeliest single score even when a win is more likely overall.

Oct 3 v Wingate W 51% · T 24% · L 25% likeliest 1–1 · compare
Oct 7 at Lenoir-Rhyne W 50% · T 21% · L 29% likeliest 1–1 · compare
Oct 10 at Lincoln Memorial W 36% · T 25% · L 39% likeliest 1–1 · compare
Oct 14 at Anderson (SC) W 28% · T 24% · L 49% likeliest 1–1 · compare
Oct 21 at Davis & Elkins W 31% · T 26% · L 43% likeliest 1–1 · compare
Oct 24 v Carson-Newman W 55% · T 23% · L 23% likeliest 1–1 · compare
Oct 28 v Coker W 53% · T 21% · L 25% likeliest 1–1 · compare

Results

How much each result changed the rating. A win can lower it if the model expected a bigger win; a narrow loss to a strong team can raise it.

Sep 30 v Lee W 2–1 Rating +0.01
Sep 27 at Tusculum W 2–0 Rating +0.04
Sep 19 v Emory & Henry T 0–0 Rating −0.02
Sep 16 v Virginia St. W 8–0 Rating +0.15
Sep 12 v Mars Hill W 2–0 Rating +0.05
Sep 9 at Barton W 3–0 Rating +0.06
Sep 5 at Newberry W 5–0 Rating +0.15
Aug 29 v North Greenville W 2–1 Rating −0.01
Aug 27 v Belmont Abbey T 2–2 Rating −0.05